Impact brief · 01Updated September 2026

The case for action

The burden is not only illness.
It is finding a way through.

Millions of people live with chronic, complex, or unexplained symptoms. Useful information and capable care may exist, but reaching them can require more time, energy, and expertise than an unwell person can reasonably supply.

The scale

A widespread need, often hidden in plain sight.

Chronic illness is common, multimorbidity is the norm rather than the exception, and many people remain undiagnosed. These figures describe overlapping populations and should not be added together.

>9 in 10people with ME/CFS

may not yet have a diagnosis

CDC
6.4%U.S. adults

reported current Long COVID in 2023

CDC
Quantitative evidence tells us how many.Qualitative evidence tells us what the numbers mean.

What people experience

The system can be hardest to navigate when help is needed most.

Published interviews and surveys repeatedly describe fragmented care, communication barriers, uncertainty, and a need for navigation support.

01

Care is fragmented

People with multiple chronic conditions report gaps across clinicians, settings, and treatment plans.

02

The story must be retold

Patients repeatedly reconstruct long histories while records and decisions remain scattered.

03

Uncertainty is exhausting

Normal or inconclusive tests do not erase symptoms, but they can leave people without a clear next step.

04

Finding help takes capacity

Searching, comparing, calling, and checking qualifications requires energy that illness may have already depleted.

05

Credibility becomes a burden

People with poorly understood conditions describe disbelief, dismissal, and difficulty communicating their symptoms.

06

No diagnosis can mean no map

People often need practical support before a condition has a name, not only after diagnosis.

THE HUMAN REALITY

When energy, concentration, or mobility is limited, every extra search, phone call, repeated history, and dead end has a cost.

The gap

Information exists.
A usable path often does not.

Research is written for specialists. Services are divided by diagnosis, geography, insurance, and scope of practice. Provider directories rarely explain how listings were reviewed. People without a diagnosis may not know which door to try first.

Better Health Institute is being built to organize that middle space: after someone realizes they need help, but before they know exactly what kind of help to seek.

What we will do

Turn scattered information into a practical next step.

Our role is navigation and education. We do not diagnose, prescribe, replace a licensed clinician, or promise a particular outcome.

01

Start with the person

Accept a diagnosis, a symptom pattern, or “not known” as a valid starting point.

02

Make evidence usable

Turn authoritative research into plain-language summaries with sources, review dates, and uncertainty made visible.

03

Reduce the work of navigating

Provide practical tools to organize symptoms, prepare for visits, and identify reasonable care categories.

04

Build trustworthy pathways

Connect people with verified resources and practitioners under transparent standards, without paid ranking.

Clear inputsLess search burdenBetter-prepared decisionsMore appropriate connections

How we will know

Measure whether navigation becomes easier.

These are the proposed measures for an initial pilot. They are a framework for accountability, not claims about results already achieved.

Reach

People who use guides, tools, and navigation support; geography and access needs served.

Clarity

Percentage of users who can identify an appropriate next step after using a resource.

Effort

Change in time spent searching for credible information and suitable care options.

Preparedness

Change in users’ confidence and ability to communicate their history at a care visit.

Trust

Comprehension, usefulness, source quality, corrections, and conflicts disclosed.

Equity

Whether resources work for rural, low-income, disabled, and undiagnosed communities.

Proposed pilot target70%

of users can identify a reasonable next step

Proposed pilot target30%

reduction in self-reported search time

Proposed pilot target85%

rate resources as understandable and useful

Why this work matters

People should not need to become experts in a fragmented system just to find credible help.

Reducing the work between “something is wrong” and “I know what to do next” is a meaningful public benefit. That is the work Better Health Institute is preparing to do.

See our programs Read our transparency commitments